1 hour ago, 'tarako said:
It was my interpretation of Pandy, but i had no way to verify I was correct besides help pande, which is like a 15 year old helpfile. I was correct, but there was nothing to indicate I was. So without any direction, and seeing other players who didnt hadnt even been created while I was already V getting their promotions I have to assume I am doing something very, very poorly.
You did have a way to verify, though. Pray in game. Post in prayer. DM on Discord. If you aren't certain whether your RP is in line with your alignment/cabal, ask.
That said, if I am reading the overall sentiments of this thread correctly, we do not truly seem to be talking about a "standardized" set of requirements for Trusted. What is being requested seems to be more clear and/or abundant communication initiated by the staff.
The reason I ask is because standardized requirements will not fix the problem you cited in your example. The problem of characters "slipping through the cracks" is not going to be solved by standardized, yet still A. subjective and B. manually implemented promotions and other rewards. What will solve those problems would be a mutual system of open communication between the staff and the players.
Before I go further on that, please feel free to correct me if I am not understanding your example.
Quote
My more behind the scenes manipulative/scheming playstyle was being overshadowed by the more aggressive, in your face style the other players in nexus at the time where putting out.
To this very point, I do not see any feasible way for us to quantify manipulation and/or scheming, at least not in a reasonable way. I could task you to "manipulate someone" to become Trusted, and you could convince someone to go to Gear even though they wanted to go to Dischord, adding in a guilt trip that you helped them level and went where they wanted last time. Or I could task you to "manipulate someone" and you could convince Tribunal to declare war on Knight. Those are two very different scenarios, but they both meet "the standard". Only one would, in my opinion, merit the promotion.
Quote
While I can understand your example @Anume in the case of Seviks I was waiting patiently, it wasnt until everyone else in the cabal had been promoted to T that I deleted because I thought that I was doing everything wrong and vocalized the frustration. Only to find out that I was doing a good job (as you yourself observed, and stated in the prayer thread) but in those situations, with a safety net in place, you could have mentioned what you witnessed me doing in game, and the entire situation had been circumvented.
People have repeatedly brought up their own past characters in the thread. Please keep in mind that it puts the staff in a very awkward position if we have/had concerns about your character and you identify examples that, on their own, make it sound like your character was perfect and simply falling through the cracks. As I mentioned before - quite vaguely, but intentionally - those cases occur very rarely. And even if you, yourself, are not aware, there may have been details about your character that also played a role in holding you back. The staff is almost never going to bring those up in a public venue, but it does make the discussion uncomfortable.
For example, if I watch you log out without the standard or hide/log off from big scary enemies, I am very unlikely to bring that up. If you then delete out of frustration from not getting promoted, and I say that you were doing a good job and I enjoyed your character, that does not mean that I also felt you deserved a promotion. It could mean that I was watching and waiting for the to improve or for you to do something great that offset it.
That said, if you genuinely feel like you have been overlooked, I refer you again to my first point - say something about it. Say it in game via note. Say it in game via prayer. Post it on the prayer forum. DM your Immortal on Discord or the forums. If you truly have been overlooked, the only way the rest of the staff can help to remedy the situation is if they know about it.